Experiment
4 |
Task:
|
Rats were given two signals
one with high pay and the other with low pay. In the high pay condition
rewards are always dropped while in low pay condition rewards are
given in treatment probablities of 1 and then .25.
|
|
To prevent
rats from tracking next oppurtinity for reward based on previous their
previous response a bar press only had .25 probability of stopping
the trial.
|
|
Figure
10
|
|
|
The data
shows the effect perfectly.
|
|
The authors
believe this shows that response variation is a function of reward
anticipation. When the reward anticaption is low response variation,
in this case button press duration, increases.
|
|
The authors then goes on
to calucuate an extinction rate.
|
|
|
The analysis
showed that as extinction increased, as measured by decreased bar
press rate the response duration began to increase. This suggets that
during extinction reward anticipation is reduced and therefore response
variation increases.
|
|
| |
| Conclusion: |
Experiment
4 demonstrates that response variation occurs when reward anticpation
is reduced. Furthermore it shows that when extinction occurs response
vartiation goes up because reward anticipation decreases.
|
| |
|
| |
| |