A good many personal
qualities, which can be perceived on the surface and which seem
at first to be various and unconnected, may be understood as manifestations
or derivatives of a more fundamental single attitude, namely,
of a relative lack of overriding guilt, of crippling shame, and
of extreme or severe anxiety. This is in direct contrast with
the neurotic person, who in every instance may be described as
crippled by guilt and/or shame and/ or anxiety. Even the normal
member of our culture feels unnecessarily guilty or ashamed about
too many things and has anxieties in too many unnecessary situations.
Our healthy individuals find it possible to accept themselves
and their own nature without chagrin or complaint or, for that
matter, even without thinking about the matter very much.
They can accept their own human nature with all its shortcomings,
with all its discrepancies from the ideal image, without feeling
real concern. It would convey the wrong impression to say that
they are self-satisfied. What we must say rather is that they
can take the frailties and sins, weaknesses and evils of human
nature in the same unquestioning spirit that one takes or accepts
the characteristics of nature. One does not complain about water
because it is wet, or about rocks because they are hard, or about
trees because they are green. As the child looks out upon the
world with wide, uncritical, innocent eyes, simply noting and
observing what is the case, without either arguing the matter
or demanding that it be otherwise, so does the self-actualizing
person look upon human nature in himself and in others. This is
of course not the same as resignation in the Eastern sense, but
resignation too can be observed in our subjects especially in
the face of illness and death.
Be it observed that this amounts to saying in another form what
we have already described; namely, that the self-actualized person
sees reality more clearly: our subjects see human nature as it
is and not as they would prefer it to be. Their eyes see what
is before them without being strained through spectacles of various
sorts to distort or shape or color the reality. 5 23
The first and most obvious level of acceptance is the so-called
animal level. These self-actualizing people tend to be good and
lusty animals, hearty in their appetites and enjoying themselves
mightily without regret or shame or apology. They seem to have
a uniformly good appetite for food; they seem to sleep well; they
seem to enjoy their sexual lives without unnecessary inhibition,
and so on for all the relatively physiological impulses. They
are able to "accept" themselves not only on these low
levels, but at all levels as well; e.g., love, safety, belongings,
honor, self-respect. All of these are accepted without question
as worthwhile simply because they are part of human nature and
because these people are inclined to accept the work of nature
rather than to argue with her for not having constructed things
to a different pattern. This shows itself in a relative lack of
the disgusts and aversions seen in average people, and especially
in neurotics, e.g., food annoyances, disgust with body products,
body odors, and body functions.
Closely related to self-acceptance and to acceptance of others
is (a) their lack of defensiveness, protective coloration, or
pose, and (b) their distaste for such artificialities in others.
Cant, guile, hypocrisy, "front," "face," playing
a game, trying to impress in conventional ways-these are all absent
in themselves to an unusual degree. Since they can live comfortably
even with their own shortcomings, these finally come to be perceived,
especially in later life, as not shortcomings at all, but simply
as neutral personal characteristics.
This is not an absolute lack of guilt, shame, sadness, anxiety,
defensiveness; it is a lack of unnecessary (because unrealistic)
guilt, etc. The animal processes, e.g., sex, urination, pregnancy,
menstruation, growing old, etc., are part of reality and so must
be accepted. Thus, no healthy woman feels guilty or defensive
about being female or about any of the female processes.
What healthy people do feel guilty about (or ashamed, anxious,
sad, or defensive) are (a) improvable shortcomings, e.g., laziness,
thoughtlessness, loss of temper, hurting others; (b) stubborn
remnants of psychological ill health, e.g., prejudice, jealousy,
envy; (c) habits, which, though relatively independent of character
structure, may yet be very strong; or (d) shortcomings of the
species or of the culture or of the group with which they have
identified. The general formula seems to be that healthy people
will feel bad about discrepancies between what is and what might
very well be or ought to be. 1 10 12