Open hostility drives people to greatness. One needs only to examine the improvements of mankind at the demands of great armies embattled with great enemies. Conflict yields massive amounts of frustration, and those engaged in said conflict, will find themselves generating many novel and unique solutions to overcome that frustration. Furthermore, such hostility will generate committed effort insuring said solutions are brought to fruition. Effectively, open hostility generates and sustains abnormally long attention spans and novel unique explanations. With this being the case, why not arrange institutions of research together in such way so as to maximize hostility between warring parties. The adherents of one explanation are placed on one side of the department office and the antagonists on the other side. Both armies would be charged with conquering the other army by finding the most the most consistent method for allaying the mental perturbation in question. Whichever method is most effective and controlling the cognitions necessary to attenuate the perturbation is the victor. Keeping the two groups of combatants in such close proximity will maintain acumen and assiduousness insuring constant and perpetual generation of novel explanations and unfaltering commitment to finishing these methods. Nothing like hatred to increase the expediency of mankind's development of 'truth'.